Total Pageviews

Thursday, October 7, 2021

Déjà Vù

The Human Memory surely acts as an indispensable asset for all people around us to boast about. Possessing good memory inarguably serves us an edge over our competitors in the natural world. Wait, haven't you already read this before? Or doesn't it seem quite too similar to something that you've already been through? Such sensations of having something experienced before even when you are witnessing it for the very first time just isn't that uncommon as it may seem to you consciously. While some of these many astonishing instances are absolutely appropriate when your memory system ultimately retrieves the memories related to that particular event, others may seem equally perturbing when such instances trigger a feeling of intense familiarity that quickly fades away leaving the subject entirely shocked. Such kinds of experiences together contribute to what civilized people in the developing world have increasingly come to refer as Déjà vu.

But What exactly is it and how does it manifest?
To define its occurrence in the simplest of terms, Déjà vu is an uncanny and shadowy feeling of familiarity with a particular event, situation or occurrence that is unsettlingly profound than it normally should.

Tracing its origin in the sophisticated French language, the term which literally translates to 'Already Seen' was first introduced by Emile Boirac and since its inception researchers and scientists have speculated more than 40 theories to accurately explain the phenomenon. Originally viewing it as a component of the paranormal context, modern scientific approaches thanks to the highly efficient neuroimaging techniques and significant advancements in Cognitive Psychology have finally come to realise that it's a lot more than a mere prophetic signal or subconscious recollection of past. It stems as an anomaly of memory whereby despite of the overwhelming sense of recollection of an experience, the precise details of it such as the time, place and practical context are completely uncertain and hence believed to be wrong. While people may confuse such feelings with the failure of one's memory system to retrieve accurate details, the fact is Déjà vu is actually significantly different from a simple retrieval failure.

It can manifest due to some underlying biological cause most prominently the Temporal Lobe epilepsy which causes the brain cells to send  unregulated amount of electrical signals that ultimately result in a seizure which drives people to briefly lose control over their thoughts and movements, eventually leading them to link a novel experience to an already familiar event. Albeit this explanation has been considered plausible enough for several decades, research clearly reflects that it fails to portray the complete picture as not every Déjà Vu experience is pathological i.e. happens due to some existing underlying problem. A survey suggests that around 60-70% of people who experience this transitory mental state are healthy and hence its non-pathological. So what can be attributed as the causal factors in such cases?

1. Theory of Dual Processing- Our Nervous system and the processes related to the transmission of information it involves are pretty complex and hence are always vulnerable to errors. This theory itself is based on one i.e. delayed vision. Robert Efron tested an idea at the Veterans Hospital in Boston in 1963 whereby he proposed that a delayed neurological response might result in Deja Vu. The focus was that since information enters the processing centers of the brain via more than one path, it is possible that occasionally the blending of information might not synchronize accurately and the temporal lobe (which btw is responsible for sorting incoming information) might register a stimuli as a separate event which could result in a sudden sense of familiarity.

2. The Hologram Theory- Remembering a particular event often involves reliving it subconsciously as our sensory inputs such as the smell, sound, sight etc are normally processed and mixed together as one event. Dutch psychiatrist Hermon Sno proposed the idea that memories are like Holograms, one can recreate the entire image from a fragment of the whole. However, the smaller the fragment, one harbors, the fuzzier the present image will be. This often results in Confusion with the past where our present provokes our memory and we witness a sense of strange familiarity but there is no concrete recollection of the past because we are not presently aware of the those past memories entirely.

3. Precognitive Dreams- Dreams have for centuries been a subject of greta interest for many philosophers and psychologists and while it has been clearly established that dreams are no omens describing one's future, they certainly have been proposed by many to be the determinants behind many Deja Vu experiences. J.W. Dunne, an aeronautical engineer who designed planes in World War 2 conducted studies in 1939 using students of Oxford University where he found 12.7 percent of his subjects' dreams shared similarities with future events which could be explained as potential causes of Déjà Vu. The role of divided attention is also noteworthy in some of these instances when your brain observes some particular thing without conscious awareness and then after some time your experience of that same situation spearheads you with an overwhelming sensation of familiarity that can't be easily explained and hence subsides gradually.

Instagram: @psyched_professor

Friday, September 17, 2021

THE ADAPTIVE UNCONSCIOUS


Given below is the link for the full paper on the topic: THE ADAPTIVE UNCONSCIOUS AND IMPLICIT BIAS: AN INSIGHT INTO THEIR ROLES AND INFLUENCE ON HUMAN BEHAVIOUR AND DECISION-MAKING ESPECIALLY IN THE WAKE OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC.

I would be delighted to know your design about it,

If you find it intriguing enough do let me know in the comments or DM  @psyched_professor.

LINK

Thursday, September 9, 2021

WHY DO WE ACTUALLY SLEEP....

Sleep...it is like partial death. A descending staircase into the void of the subconscious which triggers a response that we all desire yet cannot initiate when we are in the  'Normal' state. This normal sometimes feels really burdensome; entirely full of intricate complexities. Occasionally it is just that your internal self is experiencing something gruesome and yet you cannot reflect it in a social setting simply because you fear a deviance from what we consider 'normal'. In fact, several abnormalities inarguably ascend from the ashes of being what one would envisage to be normal. The elegant words of Carl Jung- 'Neurosis is always a substitute for legitimate suffering' provide an ideal testimony to the sanctity of the argument. In such a miserable case, it is the benevolent sleep that keeps you alive by allowing you to shout your grievances off into the oblivion that surrounds and for that tiny speck of time, you realize that there is undeniably enough beauty around (that had for sure remained inconspicuous till now). If you are searching tirelessly for some particular reason that why do we sleep, then here is your answer that there is no clearly-defined true answer. No one knows any exact answer because there is simply none right now and besides scientists researching extensively over this intriguing subject, speculating the important purposes it serves, there are only pretenders who falsely claim and for the same reason they are the ones to be blamed. There are theories about the occurrence of dreams because man did realize the importance of dreams long back or putting it simply because they dragged immense attention of the ancient cultures prevalent then. Here I am to briefly introduce you to the essence of sleep - a journey that ultimately leads one to dreams which all in particular love simply because everyone accepts at least at some point that life just has a tendency to fall apart when you are awake. Even if you do not agree now, you will for sure when you'll lie down on your couch completely exhausted, since besides being an indispensable need and a basic necessity it is the world where you actually prefer to live, for afterall, it is hell lot better than reality. Frankly speaking, an escape from reality into a realm where there is no fear of past is definitely worth trying which your brain finds utterly remarkable. They say to heal wounds, you are bound not to touch them and the best way to refrain in the case of a lasting psychological injury, is to sleep. There is no fear of death, simply because you cannot die. Attempt it and you'll inevitably fail because the mind has no idea what will happen after death, even in the unconscious realm and that is where things start to become interesting...when you realize that you have conquered the greatest fear that exists, when you have succeeded in tricking the organ that mercilessly tricks you more often (hallucinations and delusions being those indisputable tactics after all) it is there where the glory lies. In the surreptitious sphere where one lives and desires to reside,  where there are no boundaries, no rules to abide; one gets rid of all his pensive thoughts and finds solace...when waves of tranquillity wash away every single trace of grimace. When you stand alone, alleviated, under a starry clear sky, having left society and broken all ties...where you are free to explore with no limitations, what the heart actually yearns for...since whenever you feel like returning back to your original reality or somewhat that grim insanity, fortunately your alarm will go off and woooooosh! You are back...

Intrigued by the conversation I had with my student  Satvik Dev.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

PARAPSYCHOLOGY: SCIENCE OF ANOMALIES OR A SEARCH FOR GHOST

Augustine Escoffier once rightly proclaimed that Novelty is the universal cry which irrefutably is the fundamental notion today underlying the open sphere of innovative researches being carried out all around us. But while craving for novel experiences is becoming an exceedingly common mania among people these days, eye-witness accounts of experiences have been and continue to raise eyebrows today when the description highlights the negative side of a person’s beliefs and affirms the existence of not so uncommonly discussed paranormal entities. Albeit claims and rumoured sightings of what people usually refer to as ghosts or spirits have been blatantly rejected by scientists often citing them as instances lacking concrete evidence resulting due to various natural phenomena, intriguing questions have never seized to sprout out regarding the unnatural occurrences or impossible to believe verbal narrations of stories in support of the presence of such abnormal or mysterious bodies.

Hence, while the actual existence of such entities or prevalence of psychic powers which they seem to possess are and shall continue to remain hotly debated, I find it absolutely necessary to discuss about what could be the stimulating processes in action or the mental forces underlying the psychological functioning during such particular times that may particularly lead an individual to encounter strange realities in a specific setting. Concepts such as population stereotype, Implicit Universality of Paranormal Beliefs, Sleep Paralysis, Existential Infrasound, Misperceived Self-Representation, Pareidolia and numerous other combined with disruptions in attention and mental processing seek to explain in great deal just how subtly one can witness a strange and spine-chilling experience without in fact being exposed to some actual relevant paranormal threat. Let me know if you are interested in knowing more about the psychology behind such experiences.

Reach out to me: @psyched_professor

Monday, May 3, 2021

Cattell’s Trait Approach......

 

This piece of writing is for the students who have problems in understanding the approach given by Raymond Cattell,

He considered personality to be a  pattern of traits providing a key to understanding and predicting a person’s future behavior. According to him traits are relatively permanent and broad reaction tendencies of personality. He distinguished between 1. Source and surface traits (which is the prime focus of this write up) 2. Constitutional and environmental-mold traits 3. Ability temperaments and dynamic traits.

The observable qualities of a personality like kindness, honesty, generosity are named as surface traits which Allport mentioned in his theory as central traits.

Cattell used observation and questionnaires and studied thousands of people and identified a certain cluster of surface traits that came up again and again, and from that he concluded that there were more general and underlying personality factors which he then called as surface traits.

And in his opinion Source traits make up the most basic structure of personality and are underlying factors that are responsible for the inter-correlation among the surface traits.

What I would add here is that we all have the same source traits but we do not possess them in same amount. For example , intelligence is a source trait that everyone has (at least I hope that)but all do not possess intelligence in the same amount hence the bell shaped curve.

Cattell found 23 source traits in normal persons and 16 of which he studied in detail. And then used these 16 to construct his Sixteen personality factor questionnaire.

The sixteen factors include 1. Reserved vs. Outgoing 2. Less intelligent vs. More intelligent 3. Emotional vs. Stable 4. Humble vs. Assertive 5. Sober vs. hapy-go-lucky 6. Expedient vs. Conscientiousness 7. Shy vs. Venturesome 8. Tough-minded vs. Tender- minded 9.Trusting vs. Suspicious 10. Practical vs. Imaginative 11. Forthright vs. Shrewd 12. Placid vs. Apprehensive 13. Conservative vs. Experimenting 14. Group-tied vs. Self sufficiency 15. Casual vs. Controlled and 16. Relaxed vs. Tense.

In addition to these he proposed 7 new Factors as well and they are Excitability, Zeppia vs. Coasthenia , boorishness vs. mature socialization, sanguine casualness, group dedication with sensed inadequacy and Social panache vs. explicit expression.

The sixteen source traits utilized in 16PF are used to make distinction between normal ad neurotics, they fail to assess all aspects of deviant behavior and the characteristics of psychotics (which I’m particularly interested in).

 


Let me know in comment section your thoughts and views about his approach.

Feel free to contact me on Instagram @psyched_professor